Public Lands are Your Lands

With families and visitors in town, there are many people enjoying the great Montana outdoors. The Flathead Valley is a tourist destination and it’s easy to understand why businesses are supportive of public places.

We are blessed to live in one of the most beautiful areas of the nation. The water is still clean, the air pure and the public lands are mostly open and accessible.

A decade ago, former Gov. Judy Martz’ administration was in Whitefish touting a new approach to state public lands around Whitefish. Its goal included selling the most prized public assets that the people of the state own. By constitution these state public lands are held in trust for the people.

Luckily the people of Whitefish – led by current city councilor and then former mayor Andy Feury – had a different approach that included conservation, education and recreation. Since then many miles of public trails were built, development was removed from thousands of acres of public lands and public schools benefited from millions of dollars of new revenue.

Back in 2005, former state Sen. Dan Weinberg sponsored legislation that paved the way for a successful endeavor to conserve our greatest public assets around Whitefish Lake. Weinberg heard the economic needs of the area and locals who overwhelmingly favored preserving the great outdoors.

Today, retired forester and current Rep. Ed Lieser offers fresh leadership and stewardship for public places in the Beaver Lake, Spencer Mountain and Haskill Basin. With the leadership of people like Lieser, the Whitefish economy benefits greatly from public lands access.

It’s not hard to give thanks to leaders who worked hard over the decade to assure that the next generation benefits from the outdoors. But without a doubt, none of this conservation, recreation or education of public lands would have occurred without former Gov. Brian Schweitzer.

Schweitzer held steadfast to the belief that public lands are held in trust for the people. His conservation ethic protected not only places such as the North Fork but also kept nearly 13,000 acres of public lands in the north valley in public hands.

Luckily for local Montanans, leaders like Weinberg, Feury, Lieser and Schweitzer believed in keeping our greatest assets public. These four did not stand alone, as the majority of a community supported their efforts.

Even my relatives who swarmed into town recognize the glorious importance of public places such as Glacier National Park. These kinds of public places are the crown jewels of our nation. They must forever be held in the public trust to provide economic benefit for the entire valley and state.

Businesses such as Whitefish Mountain Resort would clearly be unable to properly operate if it were not for the generous federal leases that are available from the Flathead National Forest. From simple berry picking to abundant forestry and recreation, our public lands are the economic driver in the Flathead Valley.

It strikes many as odd and shortsighted that some ideological politicians are again pushing the tired mantra of selling off public lands. Luckily for Montana, Sen. Jon Tester and Gov. Steve Bullock are providing clear leadership to assure that public lands remain in public hands.

Recently Tester and Bullock wrote, “Montana was just named the most fiscally responsible state in the country; and jeopardizing our future prosperity in order to satisfy a narrow interest group that would prefer to see strip malls and condos along ridgelines and streams just doesn’t make sense.”

Most Montanans will undoubtedly agree that we need leaders who work together and preserve our way of life. Our public lands, our access to stream and lakes as well as good timber management, and our constitutionally protected right to hunt and fish are values that we cherish dearly and must pass along to the next generation.

###

-Mike Jopek is a full time farmer working the land in Whitefish.   Previously he was chairman on the Montana House Agricultural committee.   He welcomes feedback at mike@mikejopek.com.

Copyright 2014 www.mikejopek.com All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

 

Uncommon Ground: Roberts’ Court

On July 9, 2014, in Uncommon Ground, by Mike Jopek

 

Roberts’ Court

It’s hard to imagine that a pair of rulings last month from the U.S. Supreme Court won’t have an impact on upcoming elections. Voters are likely to take notice of the Chief Justice John Roberts’ courtroom ideology.

The Roberts court ruled – notably from its own 250-foot buffer zone – that certain 35-foot buffer zones protecting women’s clinics from harassment were unconstitutional. The court then said that some corporations have the religious freedom to ban contraceptives from workers’ health insurance.

Sens. Jon Tester and John Walsh disliked the decisions. Of the latter ruling, Tester said that, “The Supreme Court got it wrong.” Walsh said, “Today’s ruling means women could pay hundreds of dollars more per month because their bosses get to determine the type of health care they receive.”

Nominated by former President George W. Bush, Roberts has set the agenda since 2005. Over that time the court has returned startling decisions affecting the nation.

The Roberts’ court promoted the notion that money is speech and corporations have the right of personhood as it pertains to politics. These kinds of ruling put secret money to work during campaign season. It rejected reforms of regulated campaign finance laws from the era of former President Richard Nixon.

The Roberts’ court also removed the ban on political contributions, which helped limit corruption. Roberts wrote the opinion that removed the $123,200 cap an individual could contribute to all federal candidates, political action groups and parties.

Some Republicans like the Roberts’ court decisions. It’s become quite apparent that the Roberts’ court has activist intentions. It appears as if it wants to ideologically change the politics of the nation and cater to corporate personhood with religious rights.

The justices of the Supreme Court serve life terms. Four of the justices are well over the age of 70. Ruth Bader Ginsburg is over 80, while Stephen Breyer, Anthony Kennedy and Antonin Scalia are all quickly approaching that milestone.

It’s not hard to imagine that the next and 114th Congress will confirm another Supreme Court Justice to replace a retiring member. What candidate is nominated and confirmed depends largely on the political makeup of the Senate.

If Republicans boot Walsh from the long-held Democratic Senate seat, the next justice would undoubtable be more ideologically conservative. But furthering any ideology that promotes more secret money in politics and corporate rights over women’s rights is not good for the middle class.

Democrats should wise up, midterm elections matter. Voter turnout is a key determining factor of who wins races like the Montana Senate. If young voters refuse to cast a ballot, the next Supreme Court Justice will certainly be more ideologically conservative that the five men who ruled that woman workers have no rights to contraceptive insurance coverage from some corporate bosses.

It’s easy to be apathetic about politics. Voter perception of the three federal branches of government is low, with the Supreme Court polling at a meager 30 percent confidence. In politics the middle class values of decency, honesty and hard work have taken the backseat to an ever more corporate and ideological agenda.

The ideological men of the high court appear emboldened. It’s easy to see that court decisions will move ever more ideologically right unless voters say enough.

Elections matter. Democrats should care less about polls and D.C. consultants, and put boots on the ground in Montana to assure that base and young voters turnout. In midterm elections, the single largest decider on who wins is voter turnout.

Young or women voters may stay at home, disenfranchised and disengaged from politics. But ignoring the ballot assures a justice system even more ideologically conservative than the Roberts court. And so far, it hasn’t much sided with everyday Montanans.

###

-Mike Jopek is a full time farmer working the land in Whitefish.   Previously he was chairman on the Montana House Agricultural committee.   He welcomes feedback at mike@mikejopek.com.

Copyright 2014 www.mikejopek.com All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

 

Uncommon Ground: Ninth Grade Math

On June 25, 2014, in Uncommon Ground, by Mike Jopek

 

Ninth Grade Math

During the waning days of the 2009 Montana Legislature, I felt defeated. I knew in my heart and gut that because of the Legislature’s boneheaded property tax reappraisal approach, the pocket books of older citizens like Gladys, Agnes and June would be hit hard.

The last reappraisal mirrored the market boom years of 2002 to mid-2008, and nowhere were property speculators more active than the Flathead. When the subsequent market took a nosedive from Wall Street’s betting many homeowners felt values were underwater.

Maybe it was all those math classes I took in college, but I found the reams of information provided by the Montana Department of Revenue quite compelling. The formula told you that without proper mitigation, homeowners would be stung with higher taxes. Any ninth grade math student should have seen it coming.

Most Republicans did not believe me or the volumes of data. Then, like now, over simplistic political rhetoric rules the vote. Many wanted to transform the bills into vehicles to provide tax bennies to special interest groups.

Even today there are no lobbyists in Helena who solely represent the interest of people living in their homes. Mistakenly I thought that was the job of a legislator.

Since the GOP’s committees would not permit a tax cap approach, the Montana House embraced a simple philosophy: be fair to all but cater to the elderly, the poor, the disabled veterans and homeowners who would experience extraordinary escalations in value.

The Senate had a vastly different outlook, and time proved them wrong. Many local Republicans proceeded to travel across the county explaining that they would fix their mess if reelected. No fixes materialized.

The next reappraisal is up. The average market is flat from 2008 levels and region wide we recovered much loss since the Great Recession. But many homeowners will still see change.

Expect oil boom counties to experience extraordinary market valuation increases. The 5 million acres of agricultural lands in Montana should brace itself for the market conditions given how crops like wheat and alfalfa that did particularly well in proceeding years.

Most traditional homeowners in the Flathead will likely not see much change. Lake property will likely see increases. Most of these tax outliers felt the brunt of the last process. Given that most lake owners no longer live in their homes, it is quite simple to cap taxes. An approach I favor, but strongly opposed by many.

For local taxing jurisdictions, any base losses will simply be settled by higher mill levies. At half the rate of inflation over three years, it seems benign. But given how new construction is calculated and the billions of valuation wealth in the valley’s tax base, bills may increase. Really, when was the last time a homeowner saw their tax bills go down?

I am a firm believer that those who build our community, who invested all their lives to assure that people like us have good educations and great quality of live, should never be taxed out of their homes.

The next Legislature will not do what I recommend. They will not do what you recommend either. They will play geopolitics with select cities’ mill caps, and cater to lobbyist who will feed them more steaks and liquor than thought humanly possible to stomach.

The Legislature must stop meddling about, listen to the department’s data, and then lawmakers should cap taxes for people who live in their homes. That’s the same benefit offered to farm land and forest land.

Many politicians will tell you that taxes are complicated, like calculus. Tax formulas are like ninth grade math. Pay attention, someone always gets a break at the end of the Legislature. I hope it is people who live in their homes.

###

-Mike Jopek is a full time farmer working the land in Whitefish.   Previously he was chairman on the Montana House Agricultural committee.   He welcomes feedback at mike@mikejopek.com.

Copyright 2014 www.mikejopek.com All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

 

Uncommon Ground: 21 Percent Over 16 Years

On June 11, 2014, in Uncommon Ground, by Mike Jopek

 

21 Percent Over 16 Years

President Barack Obama’s historic decision to act on carbon emissions will undoubtedly emit years of ideological political rhetoric. The proposal is several hundred pages but calls for a state-based solution to reducing 2005 carbon emissions by 30 percent from coal plants over the next 16 years.

Congress ignores carbon pollution but routinely doles out hundreds of billions of dollars in taxpayer funds for weather-related mitigation like super-storm disaster relief, fierce forest fires and selective crop insurance.

Whether an individual feels that the president’s proposal goes too far, or not far enough, it’s about time that someone elected acted. From the winter’s Polar Vortex to vanishing glaciers in the park to native trout losses to timber killing beetles to freakish hailstorms pummeling croplands, action is warranted.

Back when acid rain decimated the Northeastern states, Congress and the president mandated that scrubbers be used on Midwest coal plant’s smoke stacks to capture polluting gasses.

Gov. Steve Bullock said that he would review the emissions rule so the state can provide “a made-in Montana solution.” States have several years to come up with a plan, but Montana is already generating plenty more energy from renewable sources.

In 2005, Gov. Brian Schweitzer led and convinced the Montana Legislature to adopt a Renewable Energy Portfolio. Under Schweitzer’s plan, Montana is well under way to provide 15 percent of the state’s energy from renewable source by 2015.

Planning for a 21 percent reduction in carbon from Montana over the next 16 years seems simple, but rich power interests and cowardly politicians will whine loudly.

In 2007 Schweitzer signed “clean and green” legislation that provides tax incentives for energy derived from new sources of power like wind, solar and geothermal. Given the wave of wind power that spins across the state, Schweitzer’s proposals are a success.

Schweitzer’s success was challenged by the 2011 tea-party controlled Legislature, which oddly attempted to increase taxes for renewable energy production. Ideological legislators also proposed policy statements that said global warming was good for business.

Legislatures ultimately came to grips with the fact that Montana is a net power exporter relying upon the power portfolios of neighboring and importing states, which require a mix of renewable power.

Many expect more recycled nonsense in the 2015 Legislature, which will need to implement some of the economic solutions for Montana and the generations of people who seek a plan for more stable weather.

It’s in Montana’s economic interest to come up with a state-based plan to mitigate the effects of over polluting the atmosphere with carbon. Some energy providers already seek cheaper forms of power from local sources.

The Flathead Electric Co-op partnered with the county landfill to capture the gas from trash to generate power. The Co-op partnered up with Stoltze Land and Lumber to produce bio-energy from timber waste, and coordinates with the city of Whitefish on hydropower from the Haskill Basin watershed.

Some ignore the weather, but even a farmer like me can tell that patterns are changing. From bigger and unexpected early season hail storms to a late or early springtime to precipitation that simply may never fall, the pattern is chaos.

But while some bury their heads in the sand, the National Farmers Union president said, “Agriculture stands ready to be an important part of the solution to our climate challenges. I encourage Congress and the administration to engage the agricultural community in reducing carbon pollution by creating voluntary incentive for sequestering carbon and implementing conservation strategies that preserve our limited soil and water resource.”

Working farmer and Sen. Jon Tester initially called the President’s effort a “responsible proposal.” Our generation is hopeful that more of today’s leaders responsibly act on a big economic and environmental challenge facing the planet.

###

-Mike Jopek is a full time farmer working the land in Whitefish.   Previously he was chairman on the Montana House Agricultural committee.   He welcomes feedback at mike@mikejopek.com.

Copyright 2014 www.mikejopek.com All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

 

Uncommon Ground: Primary Brouhaha

On May 14, 2014, in Uncommon Ground, by Mike Jopek

 

Primary Brouhaha

Early voting began last week to pick the party candidates for the fall’s general election. Come June 3, Democrats are as likely to nominate Sen. John Walsh and John Lewis to top the ballot as Republicans are to nominate Rep. Steve Daines and former state Sen. Ryan Zinke.

Primary elections are rightly open to all voters; just select a ballot. Gratefully, Montana does not register voters by party. Independents’ votes count.

Fewer voters are choosing to participate in June’s primary elections. At times, as few as a quarter of all eligible voters pick the candidates who advance to November’s general ballot. That’s not a lot of voters choosing the party candidates.

Statewide there are a couple dozen Legislative primary elections where a tea party-style candidate is pitted against a more Main Street Republican. In the Flathead more extreme candidates often win primary elections as moderates and independents simply don’t vote.

Democrats face younger and more progressive voters not turning out in primaries while moderate voters like teachers, firefighters, and rail workers often cast ballots.

The husband and wife tea party team of former state Rep. Derek Skees and political newcomer Ronalee Skees are running against notably more moderate Republican candidates like former Kalispell Police Chief Frank Garner and PSC candidate John Campbell from Kalispell.

Republicans also choose between House Speaker Mark Blasdell and former Kalispell Mayor Tammi Fisher in the state Senate. In last year’s Montana Legislature, Speaker Blasdell squashed bills that used federal funds to pay for Medicaid expansion. That affected thousands of eligible people in places like Kalispell, Bigfork and Whitefish.

The federal funds would have paid for hospital services for sick people. Rural hospitals struggle paying for critical services provided to sick people who do not have private health insurance. Federal Medicaid funds help hospitals.

Fisher recently said that Republicans should have supported a limited expansion of Medicaid. Only one Flathead Republican, state Sen. Bruce Tutvedt, supported a Montana-made solution for Medicaid. In the last Legislature, Tutvedt and Rep. Ed Lieser tried to allow thousands of people living in the Flathead simply to go to the doctors.

Citizens are currently putting the Medicaid healthcare question on the fall’s ballot. With the healthcare of 70,000 Montanans at risk, it’s hard to understand why so many Flathead Republican legislators are opposed to Medicaid and the federal money that helps local people and hospitals.

Half the states in the nation accept federal Medicaid expansion funds. These federal dollars create local jobs like nurses and care providers in rural places like Kalispell and Whitefish.

With last session’s Republican Senate leadership running for election in the House chamber this election cycle, it’s likely that Tutvedt will be returned to leadership. Hopefully voters choose legislators willing to work with Tutvedt and Lieser to help rural hospitals get basic healthcare to local people.

Across the state Republican primary voters will choose between a Tea Party-style candidate and the fix-it practicality offered by competing Main Street Republicans.

Next session, Tutvedt would work with other moderates like Sen. Llew Jones who sponsored the better school funding bill. Jones is also one of the couple dozen Republicans facing primary races across the state from Tea Party-style challengers.

In 2006, Blasdell beat former Rep. Bernie Olson in a Republican primary. Olson had the session prior angered GOP leadership by helping pass a state budget that funded public education at more reasonable levels.

In 2015, it will be the more moderate politicians like Tutvedt and Lieser who will get stuff done in Helena. The next Legislature faces big issues like property tax reappraisal, Medicaid expansion and early childhood education.

If moderate voters are interested in pragmatic fixes to complex state policy, it’s smart to cast a primary ballot on June 3.

###

-Mike Jopek is a full time farmer working the land in Whitefish.   Previously he was chairman on the Montana House Agricultural committee.   He welcomes feedback at mike@mikejopek.com.

Copyright 2014 www.mikejopek.com All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

 

Uncommon Ground: Turnout Matters

On April 30, 2014, in Uncommon Ground, by Mike Jopek

 

Turnout Matters

Like spring planting, new elections are here. A lot of people are simply fed up with political nonsense. Politicians aren’t often focused on practical or simple policies to better the everyday lives of people.

Gridlock is the politician’s tool to effectively protect those fortunate enough to currently benefit from status quo laws and policies. Ugliness in political campaigns assures that fewer people pay attention and more or better candidates stay off the ballot. Less voter focus on policy benefits select interests.

On recess during the session Sen. Jon Tester was planting lentils, peas and barley on his farm, while Sen. John Walsh was holding education roundtables meeting with local leaders at our great state colleges.

Walsh has been listening to students. Montana rightly froze tuition at four-year schools, but average students still graduate with nearly $30,000 of debt for public education. Walsh says his plan will save students thousands of dollars by capping loan interest rates at 4 percent forever.

In the June 3 primaries many college students will vote for Walsh’s pocketbook policies. Student loan debt is catastrophically high. But it’s likely that students will choose apathy and join other nonvoters who do not participate during midterm elections.

In the 2010 midterm elections, a wave of tea partiers rode the national low voter turnout wave to Helena and Washington, D.C. Progressive and moderate politicians were tossed out by the bucket load.

The subsequent Montana Legislature was pegged by the Democratic governor as bat crap crazy, and by a veteran Republican member as scaring hometown constituents and making legislators look like a bunch of baboons.

Clearly, Montanans did not want such extreme legislation, nor did the governor as he vetoed a historic amount of socially derisive and simply bad bills. Voters routinely pay the high cost for not voting with a subsequent rash of extreme legislation.

With low voter turnout, the U.S. Senate will fall into the political control of tea partiers like those serving in the House who shut down the government. The impending rush of corporate-written bills won’t help the middle class much. Voters nationwide may suddenly ask former Gov. Brian Schweitzer to loan his Montana-registered veto branding iron to the president.

That will make great political theater, but the Sen. Ted Cruz-style politics will push to transform Medicare into vouchers and substantially increase the age of retirement. Seniors, who vote more than students, aren’t likely to put up with much more political nonsense.

Locally the Flathead Valley Community College board of trustee election is next week. Early ballots have been mailed and polls are open May 6. Next Tuesday voters will choose the direction of the college as well as K-12 education.

By measurements like the nursing program, the early childhood learning program, or the new farming programs, FVCC is doing a good job and meeting the demand of local learners and businesses.

Up for reelection are incumbent trustees John Phelps and Tom Harding. Harding has been a trustee since 1990; Phelps seeks a third term and was both a student of the college and later taught classes.

Firmly interwoven in the Flathead Valley, the community college is growing to meet the needs of the area. The community college has provided many good alternatives in the recent years and offers affordable options to the staggering private cost of public education.

Voters would be smart to participate in the FVCC and K-12 elections. Low voter turnout routinely foretells next years’ extreme or ideological politics and policies.

FVCC is the local hub of higher learning in the valley. They do a great job. How the college or local K-12 schools move forward over the coming years has everything to do with how many voter turnout to elect our leaders next Tuesday, May 6.

###

-Mike Jopek is a full time farmer working the land in Whitefish.   Previously he was chairman on the Montana House Agricultural committee.   He welcomes feedback at mike@mikejopek.com.

Copyright 2014 www.mikejopek.com All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

 

Uncommon Ground: Primary Job

On April 16, 2014, in Uncommon Ground, by Mike Jopek

 

Primary Job

The U.S. Senate passed an extension of long-term unemployment benefits that helps out-of-work workers for five months. The fate of unemployment benefits is now up to the House.

Given that the bulk of the House’s current budget cuts proposal targets programs that help people of limited means, it’s unknown if it will act any time soon on unemployment. But it is midterm elections and the GOP hungers to control the Senate. Unemployment benefits can become a political vehicle for other policy like tax cuts.

Montana is headed in the right direction. At just over 5 percent, the state unemployment is lower than it is nationally. The state budget is balanced and the next Montana Legislature will likely face hundreds of millions of dollars of budget surpluses.

The state Labor Commissioner Pam Bucy recently said that the state added 3,000 jobs in February. Nationally the economy added nearly 9 million private sector jobs in the past four years with 192,000 in March.

Gov. Steve Bullock recently released a business plan developed by Montanans. Nearly a year in drafting and written with the help of 1,000 people from all 56 counties, the Main Street Montana business plan was chaired by executives from D.A. Davidson & Co. and Washington Companies.

The business plan blueprints actions needed to achieve economic growth, create jobs, and improve wages. The plan seeks workforce training and education, policy that attracts, retains and grows business, to build upon the current foundation, markets Montana, and nurtures emerging business innovation.

It’s up to the governor and legislators to decide how best to implement the plan. But before then, voters decide who goes to Helena and works with Bullock.

It’s understandable why voters feel such discontent toward Congress. The median household income in Montana is over $45,000 annually while an individual member of Congress earns four times that amount and works half-time in session.

Republicans have been badmouthing the Affordable Care Act for four years, all the while enjoying taxpayer funded health care and retirement. The GOP may not have a plan, but millions of taxpaying citizens today receive significant tax breaks for healthcare thanks to the ACA.

Women across America cannot today be charged more than men for health insurance and birth control prescriptions are rightly covered under the ACA.

From unemployment benefits to immigration reform, from minimum wage increases to fair wages for women workers, House Republicans stand in opposition.

The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009 was the first bill signed into law by President Barack Obama. The law helps with equal pay and discourages discriminatory wage structures. Still today in Montana a women worker earns only three-quarters of her male coworker in a same-job comparison. Clearly there is more that Congress can and must do.

In Montana, Bucy recently held a Pay Equity Summit attended by hundreds of women. From now until the next Montana Legislature convenes, expect to hear more good job-related news from Montana.

Prior to the last Legislature, a report outlined how Montana could easily leverage billions in federal funding to create thousands of jobs in the medical industry. It seemed like a no-brainer to spend federal dollars to create jobs like nurses or doctors. But Montana still refuses this vital Medicaid funding.

This June, Flathead voters determine how ridged an ideologue to likely send from the Flathead to Helena next winter. The next Legislature should embrace the governor’s business plan. Beyond political rhetoric, it’s the ability to work together that creates good policy.

The primary question Republicans and Democrats should ask themselves is which politicians have the courage to compromise and work with the governor to get the job done. June primary voters decide whether the fall’s candidates are more pragmatic or more ideological.

###

-Mike Jopek is a full time farmer working the land in Whitefish.   Previously he was chairman on the Montana House Agricultural committee.   He welcomes feedback at mike@mikejopek.com.

Copyright 2014 www.mikejopek.com All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

 

 

This is the third post on political ideology. Previously I’ve posted about the US House and Senate, now using the dataset of State Legislatures, here are some details about political ideology in Montana from 1997 to 2007.   That’s a decade of state Legislative data.    The data set only included Montana for those dates even as the entire dataset is from 1993 to 2011.   Tables ranked from most conservative to least conservative.  Montana home to 13th most conservative House and 19th most conservative Senate.

Average House from 1997 to 2007    and       Average Senate from 1997 to 2007

97 to 07 ave House97 to 07 ave Senate

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

————————————————————————————————-

The Average Ideoogy of House from 1997 to 2007 accross the Nation

Ave House 97 to 07

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

———————————————————————————————-

Average Senate Ideology  in Montana from 1997 to 2007 accross Nation

Senate Comparison

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

———————————————————————————————–

The average ideology of Dems and Repubs from 1997 to 2007 in the Montana Legislature (higher number is more conservative, lower numbers less conservative)

 

 

Ave House and Senate

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

———————————————————————————————-

Details on the average ideology of Dems and Repubs from 1997 to 2007 in the Montana Legislature (higher number is more conservative, lower numbers less conservative)

 

Ave 97 to 07 House and Senate

 

 

 

 

 

——————————————————————————-

 

From 1997 to 2003 the Legislature worked on policy like deregulation of electricity, massive property tax cuts for telecommunication, top- heavy income tax cuts, tax cuts to the coal mining, and pushing the sale of public lands.  From 2005 to 2007 the Legislature worked on policy like smoking ban in public places, all day public kindergarten, Indian education funding, historic public school funding investments, $100 million homeowner property tax cuts, elimination of business equipment taxes for small operators, and wind power generation. (If you know more, email me.)

The state budget surpluses have also been significantly greater after 2005, than before 2005.   Montana maintained massive budget surpluses even during the Great
Recession.

2005 was the second 50/50 House in Montana politics.  In 2007 the House was 50/49/1.  Montana has a long history of conservative politics in the state Legislature and ranks toward the top of most conservative in the nation.   Given the firebrand political rhetoric of 2011 and 2013, it will be interesting to see the balance of dataset of ideological politics in the near future.

If you see a data or math errror let me know.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Uncommon Ground: Hungry Kids and Veterans

On April 2, 2014, in Uncommon Ground, by Mike Jopek

 

Hungry Kids and Veterans

The U.S. House finally allowed the president to sign a five-year Farm Bill. Much of the agricultural weather risk policy is good news for farmers producing crops like wheat, barley, corn, or soy. Even milk producers gained access to subsidized crop insurance.

The Farm Bill is a funding mechanism for the food and farm policy of the United States. Time will tell how the USDA interprets and implements the law. Sen. Debbie Stabenow insisted her bill was reform and “not your father’s Farm Bill.”

Last week House Republicans were irate at a major provision of the Farm Bill because the GOP’s cuts to food stamp programs may not materialize in several states, including Montana.

House Speaker John Boehner recently said, “Since the passage of the Farm Bill, states have found ways to cheat once again on signing up for people for food stamps.” Boehner is less concerned with billionaire tax cheats but focuses on hungry kids and veterans who receive dollars per day in food aid.

Likely not many Montanans or even members of Congress read the 949-page Farm Bill and accompanying Congressional Budget Office scoring. The states that avoided cuts to food in feeding hungry kids and veterans did exactly what the Farm Bill’s plain language said to do.

Recently, actor Jeff Bridges joined Gov. Steve Bullock and Darby school students to eat breakfast. Bridges and Bullock were promoting school breakfast programs that can be used across the nationwide to help hungry kids get better access to breakfast. Bullock said, “When you’re hungry, it’s hard to get creative ideas going.”

Bridges and Bullock are leaders in helping more hungry Montanans gain access to much-needed food. House Republicans are ignoring the simple fact that most of the hungry getting access to food are kids and veterans.

Montana is lucky that Sen. Jon Tester helped pass the more Senate-oriented version of the Farm Bill. The House and Rep. Steve Daines originally slashed hunger programs by $40 billion and allowed polluters to spray potent chemicals directly adjacent to rivers, streams and lakes threatening wild fish.

Montanans are lucky that Tester knows how to get stuff done and that Bullock had the smarts and leadership skills to do exactly what Congress’ farm and food policy intended.

Firebrand ideologues in Washington will continue to demagogue and argue ad nauseam about solving poverty but Bullock demonstrated that it is not hard to feed hungry kids.

The next Farm Bill can be better, no doubt about it. But some of the current policy that helps beginner farmers and school lunch programs is encouraging. Land conservation and aid to local food pantries fared better.

Montana’s grain growers gained access to huge crop insurance subsidies and disaster aid to ranchers is back big. There’s significant funding directed at fighting climate-related wildfires and bark beetle infestation that plagues our federal lands.

Congress could do much more to help grow more small local farms across the nation. More small local farms keep America safer with a secure and nutritious local food supply.

Republicans like Boehner are using food stamps as the midterm election’s red meat to attract conservative base voters. In low turnout midterm elections that’s an effective GOP campaign strategy. It’s not unlike the barrage of misinformation blabbered about healthcare.

If the House was really concerned about cheating or waste Boehner would focus more on the billions allocated to crops like tobacco and cotton and less on the meager $4.50 per day helping feed hungry kids and veterans.

The House also opposes raising the minimum wage, extending unemployment insurance, or extending Medicaid healthcare to the poor. But food stamps programs like SNAP simply feed hungry kids and veterans.

###

-Mike Jopek is a full time farmer working the land in Whitefish.   Previously he was chairman on the Montana House Agricultural committee.   He welcomes feedback at mike@mikejopek.com.

Copyright 2014 www.mikejopek.com All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

 

 

Previously I observed the House, here’s how the 113th Senate has ideologically voted.  With 1 as the most conservative and -1 as the most liberal, the data set for first half of the 113th Senate scored an average .025.

Even with the Democratic majority the  average .025 was slightly right of center and similar in ideology to Collins with .038.  The average ideology of the Senate is more right than historically but without scoring Tea party Sens. Cruz, Lee and Paul, the average was at -0.003.

113th Sen SnapObama was ranked on 47 choices while Tester on 253, Bennett on 255, Udall on 248 and Baucus on 253.

With Lee and Paul the 113th Senates’ most ideologically conservative and Senators like Warren and Sanders the most liberal, Tester ranks 58th most conservative, Baucus was 49th, Collins 46th, Murkowski 45th and McCain 37th. Tester voted like other western state Sens. like Bennet, Udall and Begich.

The average Democrat was -.387 while the average Republican was .549.  That’s in keeping with the trend the Brookings Institute shows.  Tester ranked the 11th most conservative Democrat in the 113th Senate at -.277.

 

 

 

Most Conservative Democrats                               Most Conservative Republicans

113 Sen Dem

113 Sen Rep

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Let me know if you see a math error.